CSR demonstration product · Read-only evidence record · Not a public software release
Club Volleyball / Improvement proposal 01
PROPOSED — COMMUNITY REVIEW NOT STARTED
Implementation: NOT STARTED · CV7 deferred · Contributor: UNASSIGNED · No delivery date promised
The current game offers fictional matches but no dedicated practice curriculum. Players could benefit from repeatable ways to learn game controls and contact timing without the pressure of a full match.
Optional, synthetic-only practice for serving, receiving, passing, setting, attacking, blocking and defense. Clear instructions, repeatable setups and accessible feedback should explain game mechanics without implying real-athlete evaluation or guaranteed improvement.
New and returning game players, including people who prefer untimed instruction and adjustable assistance. Youth appeal requires specialist review; age or ability must not be inferred from gameplay.
No medical, injury, recruiting, scholarship or guaranteed-performance claims. No accounts, real participant records, saved training history, uploads, messaging, payments, trackers, external rankings or personal-data collection. No changes to the accepted match authority without a separately reviewed scope.
Keep practice state in local memory. No network integration or persistent visitor records. Review new inputs for bounds, pause/restart behavior and safe resets. Any expansion of the data boundary requires a separate decision.
Equivalent keyboard, controller and touch controls; readable instructions, non-color feedback, reduced motion, adjustable timing and fatigue-aware optional breaks. Independent accessibility and coaching-content reviewers are required and currently VACANT. Do not present game drills as certified coaching.
Maintainer decision and scoped authorization first. Appoint real reviewers; do not substitute the maintainer for independent review. Resolve contribution rights and terms before accepting outside code. Create a separate branch only after APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT.
Pin the baseline and proposed commit. Run bounded input, lifecycle, privacy, accessibility and regression tests. Inventory dependencies and assets; review vulnerabilities, provenance and secret scans. Human reviewers examine failures and limitations. No self-escalation or direct proposed-to-released transition.
Record accepted before/after evidence, merge authority, exact commit/tree and distributable artifact hashes. Recheck licenses, platform qualification, device acceptance and rollback. Release and deployment require separate authorization; store uploads are not implied.